Tennis Match Analysis: Hunter, Storm vs Inglis, Maddison
The upcoming match between Hunter, Storm and Inglis, Maddison promises to be an exciting contest. Both pairs are known for their dynamic playstyles, with Storm and Maddison bringing a powerful serve-and-volley approach, while Hunter and Inglis excel in baseline rallies. The match is scheduled for August 18, 2025, at 21:00, and fans are eagerly anticipating a high-paced game.
Hunter, Storm
Inglis, Maddison
(FT)
Predictions:
Market | Prediction | Odd | Result |
---|---|---|---|
Under 1st Set Games | 51.30% | (0-2) | |
Tie Break in 1st Set (No) | 96.90% | (0-2) | |
Over 1st Set Games | 73.30% | (0-2) | |
Tie Break in Match (No) | 74.60% | (0-2) | |
Total Games 3-Way (Under 22) | 66.90% | (0-2) | |
Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5) | 57.70% | (0-2) |
Betting Predictions
Under 1st Set Games
The odds for under 52.80 games in the first set suggest that the match may open with a quick pace, potentially leading to shorter sets. Given both pairs’ aggressive playstyles, this could be a realistic outcome.
Tie Break in 1st Set (No)
With odds at 95.50 for no tie break in the first set, it’s likely that one pair will secure a decisive lead early on. This prediction aligns with the possibility of a dominant performance by either team.
Over 1st Set Games
At 71.50 odds for over 52.80 games in the first set, there is also a chance for extended rallies and longer exchanges, especially if both pairs manage to maintain their intensity throughout.
Tie Break in Match (No)
The odds of 73.20 against a tie break occurring in the match suggest that one pair might establish a significant advantage early on, potentially leading to straight-set victories.
Total Games 3-Way (Under 22)
The prediction for under 22 total games stands at 61.60, indicating that quick matches are expected. This could result from decisive breaks of serve or dominant performances by either pair.
Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5)
With odds at 56.40 for under 22.5 total games, the likelihood of a fast-paced match remains high. Both pairs’ ability to control the game from the baseline could contribute to fewer total games.